I know, I know, I spin myself as the anti-consumerist. But what I really am is discriminating. Every now and then I try something and find myself unexpectedly amazed. So here's the current list of stuff & services I love:
Monday, February 23, 2009
My favorite things (I)
Thursday, February 19, 2009
Facebook: slightly less evil than previously assumed
They switched back to their previous terms of service: http://blog.facebook.com/blog.php?post=54746167130
Tuesday, February 17, 2009
Goodbye, Facebook
To anyone who's used to seeing me on Facebook, you may notice that I've suddenly disappeared. I'm one of the people who figures Facebook's new Terms of Service is unacceptable. Here's the guilty paragraph:
Labels: Tech
Wednesday, February 11, 2009
Good enough
“It’s ... pleasant,” said S.
“Me too,” I said, and sighed. “It’s pleasant.”
“We cook dinner,” one of us said, and the other nodded.
“It’s nice. Domestic.”
“I’ve been working out a lot.”
“Work’s okay.”
“I think I’m in line for promotion,” one of us said, and the one who hadn’t said it nodded in turn.
A while later, we paid the tab, hugged goodbye, and went our separate ways. I drove the short distance home, pulled into my usual parking place, and walked down the red-painted path to my front door. I slipped the key in the lock, turned it, and went inside: home. It felt good to be here.
And yet I wonder: is this underlying something the famous, originally unvoiced female complaint? Is this what fifties and sixties feminism was about, this lurking feeling that there’s something ... more ... out there, that “pleasant” isn’t quite enough? Don’t get me wrong, I know this is 2009; I know S and I have it better, far better, than did our forebears. I know that.
And yet. Things are ... pleasant.
And pleasant isn’t quite enough.
Labels: Feminism, Normal life, Work
Monday, February 09, 2009
Dear Sprint: Your billing is deceptive and unethical. I'm never using you again. And I'm telling my friends.
To: dan@sprint.com
Hi. I'm writing to object to the way Sprint handles billing for closed accounts which are out of the contract period.
I was a satisfied Sprint customer several times over the past few years, but when I cancelled my account, Sprint charged me for an entire month's service even though I only used three days. I am now *very* unlikely to ever use Sprint again. I certainly wouldn't recommend it to a friend - even though Sprint had great call quality & data speed!
And no, not all your competitors do this. Verizon doesn't do this. I once cancelled a Verizon account (to switch to Sprint, actually!), and they very nicely prorated my final month. So the next time I want a phone, Verizon's on my good-company list. And because you didn't prorate that final month, Sprint isn't even a possibility.
I know Sprint's been working hard on improving customer satisfaction, and fixing this policy so that you prorate billing for a customer's final month - not just for me but for everyone who cancels - would be a pretty easy way to do it. Even if you're short on cash, is it really worth knowing that you're not on my shopping list the next time I want a new phone? It's pretty common for people to switch carriers. Don't you want people like me to switch back to you? I seriously doubt I'm the only person who thinks this is not OK.
My account number is [xxxxxxxxx] if you want to fix things. Although what I'd really like is a refund, AND an apology, AND hearing that you've changed this practice.
I'm very disappointed.
Sincerely,
I.E.
Labels: Other